2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C30. (320 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Dakota | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | Dakota | C30 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4699 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4266 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2039 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1447 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2640 mm |
