2000 Dodge Durango vs. 1966 Ford Zephyr
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 105 kg more than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Zephyr. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (454 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (235 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Durango | 1966 Ford Zephyr | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Durango | Zephyr |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2930 mm |
