2000 Dodge Durango vs. 1977 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,687 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 55 kg more than 1977 Ford Falcon.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (400 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford Falcon. (263 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Durango | 1977 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Durango | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4687 cc | 3273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 263 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2830 mm |
