2000 Dodge Durango vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 4,687 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 485 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mercury Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (400 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (122 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Durango | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercury |
| Model | Durango | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4687 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2400 mm |
