2000 Dodge Durango vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 305 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (454 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Durango | 1983 Oldsmobile Omega | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Durango | Omega |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2670 mm |
