2000 Dodge Durango vs. 1996 Ford Royale
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Royale would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Royale. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (454 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Royale. (173 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Royale. 2000 Dodge Durango has automatic transmission and 1996 Ford Royale has manual transmission. 1996 Ford Royale will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Dodge Durango will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Durango | 1996 Ford Royale | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Durango | Royale |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2560 mm |
