2000 Dodge Durango vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 133 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (454 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Durango | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Durango | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1302 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2430 mm |
