2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1954 Rover P4
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Rover P4 (79 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Rover P4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1954 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Rover P4 (188 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1954 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1954 Rover P4 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Neon | P4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2830 mm |