2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. (110 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC weights approximately 269 kg more than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC (189 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (186 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Neon | SC |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 189 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 72.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1161 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2830 mm |