2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (59 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Neon | Master RR |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |