2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1961 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 6638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 339 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2880 mm |