2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1964 Morris Minor
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Minor would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1964 Morris Minor. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Minor.
Because 1964 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morris Minor. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1964 Morris Minor | |
Make | Dodge | Morris |
Model | Neon | Minor |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2190 mm |