2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 9 kg more than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (177 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Neon | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Neon | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1161 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 64 L |
