2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1966 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1966 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Because 1966 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1966 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Dodge | ZAZ |
Model | Neon | 966 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2170 mm |