2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Neon | R-100 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2270 mm |