2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1971 Matra-Simca M530
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Matra-Simca M530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Matra-Simca M530 (71 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Matra-Simca M530 should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1971 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Matra-Simca M530.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Neon | 1971 Matra-Simca M530 | |
| Make | Dodge | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Neon | M530 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1971 |
| Engine Size | 1687 cc | 1699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2570 mm |
