2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1982 Opel Manta
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Manta would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1982 Opel Manta. (75 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Manta.
Because 1982 Opel Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Opel Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Manta. (98 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Manta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Neon | 1982 Opel Manta | |
| Make | Dodge | Opel |
| Model | Neon | Manta |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 98 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2640 mm |
