2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Neon weights approximately 391 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (177 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Neon | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Dodge | Zastava |
| Model | Neon | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1161 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2160 mm |
