2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1983 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Zastava 2101 (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Zastava 2101 should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1983 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Neon | 1983 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Dodge | Zastava |
| Model | Neon | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1687 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2430 mm |
