2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1984 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Micra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Micra would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Micra. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Micra. (74 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1984 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Neon | Micra |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2310 mm |