2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1991 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Holden Apollo would be higher. Both 2000 Dodge Neon and 1991 Holden Apollo are equipped with a 1,996 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1991 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1991 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Holden Apollo weights approximately 44 kg more than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (186 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1991 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Neon | Apollo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1161 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |