2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | Tempo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |