2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1994 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover (134 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1994 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Dodge Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover (270 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1994 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1994 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Neon | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |