2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (108 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (137 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Neon | 200 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |