2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Dodge Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer (373 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (160 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Neon | Lancer |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2520 mm |