2000 Dodge Neon vs. 1999 Proton 400
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1999 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1999 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Neon weights approximately 191 kg more than 1999 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (186 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 1999 Proton 400 | |
Make | Dodge | Proton |
Model | Neon | 400 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1161 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |