2000 Dodge Neon vs. 2003 Proton 300
To start off, 2003 Proton 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Proton 300 (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 2003 Proton 300 | |
Make | Dodge | Proton |
Model | Neon | 300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1687 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2450 mm |