2000 Dodge Neon vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Neon | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Dodge | MCC |
| Model | Neon | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1687 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1810 mm |
