2000 Dodge Neon vs. 2009 Opel Combo
To start off, 2009 Opel Combo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2009 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2009 Opel Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (186 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 2009 Opel Combo | |
Make | Dodge | Opel |
Model | Neon | Combo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 80.6 mm |
Top Speed | 207 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 52 L |