2000 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Neon would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 278 kg more than 2000 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (186 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon. 2013 Lotus Evora has automatic transmission and 2000 Dodge Neon has manual transmission. 2000 Dodge Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lotus Evora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Neon | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Neon | Evora |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 83 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1161 kg | 1439 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |
