2000 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Neon would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 160 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Dodge | Mini |
Model | Neon | Roadster |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2467 mm |