2000 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Dodge Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (443 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (313 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon. 2013 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 2000 Dodge Neon has manual transmission. 2000 Dodge Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Neon | Tundra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
Torque | 313 Nm | 443 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3700 mm |