2000 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo X670 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo X670 (320 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (313 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo X670 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon. 2013 Volvo X670 has automatic transmission and 2000 Dodge Neon has manual transmission. 2000 Dodge Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volvo X670 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Neon | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Neon | X670 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 313 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2815 mm |