2000 Dodge Ram vs. 1958 Jaguar MK IX
To start off, 2000 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 365 kg more than 2000 Dodge Ram.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Jaguar MK IX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jaguar MK IX. (330 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jaguar MK IX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Ram | 1958 Jaguar MK IX | |
| Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
| Model | Ram | MK IX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6200 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2900 mm |
