2000 Dodge Ram vs. 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC
To start off, 2000 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Ram weights approximately 80 kg more than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. (186 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Ram | 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Ram | SC |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6200 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2830 mm |
