2000 Dodge Ram vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2000 Dodge Ram is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Ram weights approximately 745 kg more than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Ram | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Ram | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6200 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 1940 mm |