2000 Dodge Ram vs. 1981 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Dodge Ram is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Ram weights approximately 885 kg more than 1981 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. (41 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Ram | 1981 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Ram | Fronte |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 543 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 29 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 41 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6200 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2160 mm |