2000 Dodge Ram vs. 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2000 Dodge Ram is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 160 kg more than 2000 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero. (201 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Ram | 1983 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Pajero |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2476 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 201 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6200 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2710 mm |