2000 Dodge Ram vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2000 Dodge Ram is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Ram weights approximately 66 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi Magna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Magna. (205 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Ram | 1996 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ram | Magna |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2351 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1374 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6200 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2730 mm |
