2000 Dodge Ram vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Ram weights approximately 270 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Ram | 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Dingo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6200 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2450 mm |