2000 Dodge Ram vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Ram (173 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Ram | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Ram | Pixo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3906 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2360 mm |