2000 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Compass weights approximately 38 kg more than 2000 Dodge Ram.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Jeep Compass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Compass. (223 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Ram | 2011 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Ram | Compass |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 223 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6200 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2634 mm |