2000 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2013 GMC Yukon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1031 kg more than 2000 Dodge Ram.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 GMC Yukon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 GMC Yukon. (454 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 GMC Yukon. 2013 GMC Yukon has automatic transmission and 2000 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 2000 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 GMC Yukon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Ram | 2013 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Dodge | GMC |
Model | Ram | Yukon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 316 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 454 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 2471 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6200 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1954 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2946 mm |