2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 310 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Commander. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Commander.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Dodge | Studebaker |
Model | Viper | Commander |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7999 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 140 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.6 mm | 71.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 7.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 273 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3070 mm |