2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1963 Humber Sceptre
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 8,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (501 HP) has 423 more horse power than 1963 Humber Sceptre. (78 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1963 Humber Sceptre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (678 Nm) has 554 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Humber Sceptre. (124 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1963 Humber Sceptre | |
Make | Dodge | Humber |
Model | Viper | Sceptre |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8000 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 501 HP | 78 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 124 Nm |
Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2570 mm |