2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 342 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Viper | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Dodge | Reliant |
| Model | Viper | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7999 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 664 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2290 mm |
