2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 8,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (501 HP) has 410 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (678 Nm) has 528 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Viper | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Rover |
| Model | Viper | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8000 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 501 HP | 91 HP |
| Torque | 678 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |
