2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1965 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (495 HP) has 442 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Viper weights approximately 455 kg more than 1965 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (678 Nm) has 585 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1965 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Dodge | Zastava |
Model | Viper | 1500 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 7990 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 495 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |