2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1966 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (1,154 Nm) has 1102 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1966 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Dodge | ZAZ |
Model | Viper | 966 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 7990 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 1154 Nm | 52 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.8 mm | 54.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2170 mm |