2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (1,154 Nm) has 1019 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Viper | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7990 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 1154 Nm | 135 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2320 mm |